Register
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 146
  1. #1
    mixiboi's Avatar
    mixiboi is offline Philly Remixed
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Lawncrest
    Posts
    8,178

    Default Best Places to Raise Kids are surprising bland and colorless....

    Not surprising coming from Anti-PhillyMag.

    Best Places to Raise Kids: The 15 Most Family-Friendly Philly Suburbs | Philadelphia Magazine Articles


    Narberth
    Haddonfield
    Huntingdon Valley
    Wayne
    Moorestown
    Medford Lakes
    Upper Providence
    Warwick
    Upper Makefield
    Wynnewood
    Swarthmore
    Lafayette Hill
    Jenkintown
    East Marlborough

    HOW WE SELECTED THE TOWNS
    Knowing the importance of schools to parents, we first narrowed districts to those with minimum SAT scores of 520 each for reading, math and writing. Next, since kids thrive among other kids, we selected towns with populations of at least 2,000 and where, in most cases, at least 25 percent of residents are under 18. Towns also had to have low crime rates (fewer than two violent crimes per 1,000 residents, and fewer than 30 nonviolent per 1,000). Finally, we assigned reporters to uncover intangibles such as community involvement, arts and active sports amenities, green space and diversity, so we could determine the best of the best that remained.
    Last edited by mixiboi; 08-12-2012 at 02:59 PM.
    Graphic Designer, Social Media Consultant. Twitter: @Sdlaugh

  2. #2
    annie's Avatar
    annie is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    West Philly
    Posts
    2,288

    Default

    I never thought I'd say these five words but to be fair to PhillyMag:
    Best Places to Raise Kids: Great Philadelphia Schools | Philadelphia Magazine Articles
    Best Places to Raise Kids: Raising Kids in the City | Philadelphia Magazine Articles

    were in the prior month's issue. The first is a rather unimaginative listicle of the city's "good" public schools and the second is an actually pretty interesting article by Ronnie Polaneczky on raising children in the city.

  3. #3
    Giavella Water is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    423

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mixiboi View Post
    Not surprising coming from Anti-PhillyMag.

    Best Places to Raise Kids: The 15 Most Family-Friendly Philly Suburbs | Philadelphia Magazine Articles


    Narberth
    Haddonfield
    Huntingdon Valley
    Wayne
    Moorestown
    Medford Lakes
    Upper Providence
    Warwick
    Upper Makefield
    Wynnewood
    Swarthmore
    Lafayette Hill
    Jenkintown
    East Marlborough
    I'll bet none of those school districts were saddled with the likes of ex superintendent Ackerman and her racist camp followers.

  4. #4
    2happy4u is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    449

    Default

    Did you expect Philly to one of the places???

  5. #5
    Hospitalitygirl's Avatar
    Hospitalitygirl is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Miss Mannersville
    Posts
    13,050

    Default

    It's all part of the multiple generations of brain-washing that's gone on that the suburbs are the only acceptable place to "raise children" so they can squish grass between their toes and walk carelessly in the streets. They're really only 'reporting' what their audience ultimately wants to believe.
    I am not the Jackass Whisperer.

  6. #6
    Malloy's Avatar
    Malloy is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    East Falls
    Posts
    5,503

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hospitalitygirl View Post
    It's all part of the multiple generations of brain-washing that's gone on that the suburbs are the only acceptable place to "raise children" so they can squish grass between their toes and walk carelessly in the streets. They're really only 'reporting' what their audience ultimately wants to believe.
    Those areas are all nice by any standard and the schools are good.
    Like PS on Facebook!

  7. #7
    Hospitalitygirl's Avatar
    Hospitalitygirl is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Miss Mannersville
    Posts
    13,050

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Malloy View Post
    Those areas are all nice by any standard and the schools are good.
    Nice, sure, but they are certainly beyond colorless.
    I am not the Jackass Whisperer.

  8. #8
    dcss1205 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Brewerytown
    Posts
    258

    Default

    I am very familiar with 2 of the 'winners', and know that those communities should have scored ZERO, in several different categories, especially civil involvement. They are both candidates for Mt. Apathy Awards.

  9. #9
    mixiboi's Avatar
    mixiboi is offline Philly Remixed
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Lawncrest
    Posts
    8,178

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by annie View Post
    I never thought I'd say these five words but to be fair to PhillyMag:
    Best Places to Raise Kids: Great Philadelphia Schools | Philadelphia Magazine Articles
    Best Places to Raise Kids: Raising Kids in the City | Philadelphia Magazine Articles

    were in the prior month's issue. The first is a rather unimaginative listicle of the city's "good" public schools and the second is an actually pretty interesting article by Ronnie Polaneczky on raising children in the city.
    Yeah I saw those while I was there, this wasn't really an attack on them for yet another "Philly sucks" article...As this wasn't really that type of article...It was more the boring list and pictures that bother me more. I know the target audience is a type of people that reads Anti-PhillyMag, but come on...see below.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hospitalitygirl View Post
    It's all part of the multiple generations of brain-washing that's gone on that the suburbs are the only acceptable place to "raise children" so they can squish grass between their toes and walk carelessly in the streets. They're really only 'reporting' what their audience ultimately wants to believe.
    The pictures say it all, with the affirmative action going on in them that scream "Quirky Non-Threatening Ethnics..aww". Its down right nauseating...
    Graphic Designer, Social Media Consultant. Twitter: @Sdlaugh

  10. #10
    Naveen is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    East Falls
    Posts
    1,605

    Default

    Well I think the article is focused explicitly on the suburbs. Not, "most family friendly areas of the philly metro", and then they exclude the entire city. It's target is people not looking to live in the city to begin with.

  11. #11
    Malloy's Avatar
    Malloy is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    East Falls
    Posts
    5,503

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dcss1205 View Post
    I am very familiar with 2 of the 'winners', and know that those communities should have scored ZERO, in several different categories, especially civil involvement. They are both candidates for Mt. Apathy Awards.
    What do you consider civil involvement?

    Now people who live in expensive and nice suburbs are apathetic?
    Like PS on Facebook!

  12. #12
    NickleDimer is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    657

    Default

    What would make these areas more colorful? Crime? Dysfunctional municipal administration from top to bottom?

  13. #13
    Volanova's Avatar
    Volanova is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    546

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NickleDimer View Post
    What would make these areas more colorful? Crime? Dysfunctional municipal administration from top to bottom?
    Those were my thoughts.

    The suburbs may not be for everyone, just as the city isn't for everyone. One is not necessarily better than the other. Some of the suburbs listed are somewhat colorful, such as Jenkintown, and at least one, Narberth, has quite a bit of local flair.

  14. #14
    Dayman's Avatar
    Dayman is offline Champion of the Sun
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Kensington/Fairhill/St. Hugh's
    Posts
    5,380

    Default

    Haddonfield is nice.

    Medford Lakes is where you go if you want to raise your children Pineys.

  15. #15
    Ray K. is offline Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Bella Vista
    Posts
    60

    Default

    Rather raise my ladies in Bella Vista than any of the aforementioned suburbs.

  16. #16
    Pitt is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    783

    Default

    My kids will be raised right here in anti-family Philadelphia.
    Comparing crime between low crime locales is an indicator of low intellect.
    I'm not giving up my life so my kids can "have a yard to play in" and avoid black people. They can go to the city park and the city pool like people did in the olden days.
    Exposure to life will teach them who to avoid.
    If the public schools are still corrupt when the time comes and they can't get into Masterman or something along those lines then I'll send their asses to Roman Catholic in chastity belts with instructions not to believe everything they hear.
    Problem solved.

  17. #17
    Hospitalitygirl's Avatar
    Hospitalitygirl is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Miss Mannersville
    Posts
    13,050

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pitt View Post
    My kids will be raised right here in anti-family Philadelphia.
    Comparing crime between low crime locales is an indicator of low intellect.
    I'm not giving up my life so my kids can "have a yard to play in" and avoid black people. They can go to the city park and the city pool like people did in the olden days.
    Exposure to life will teach them who to avoid.
    If the public schools are still corrupt when the time comes and they can't get into Masterman or something along those lines then I'll send their asses to Roman Catholic in chastity belts with instructions not to believe everything they hear.
    Problem solved.
    It's a plan that works
    I am not the Jackass Whisperer.

  18. #18
    Giavella Water is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    423

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pitt View Post
    My kids will be raised right here in anti-family Philadelphia.
    Comparing crime between low crime locales is an indicator of low intellect.
    I'm not giving up my life so my kids can "have a yard to play in" and avoid black people. They can go to the city park and the city pool like people did in the olden days.
    Exposure to life will teach them who to avoid.
    If the public schools are still corrupt when the time comes and they can't get into Masterman or something along those lines then I'll send their asses to Roman Catholic in chastity belts with instructions not to believe everything they hear.
    Problem solved.
    Why send your children to a Roman Catholic school if that's your attitude towards the school/religion? I think your kids already have issues because YOU issued them.

  19. #19
    NickleDimer is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    657

    Default

    Supposedly if your kids are raised by caring parents and comunity, then receive a decent education, they would be open minded enough to have a diverse range of experiences and know who to avoid. It sounds a lot better than leaving it all up to chance of getting into Masterman or a good Catholic school.

  20. #20
    billy ross is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    9,397

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NickleDimer View Post
    Supposedly if your kids are raised by caring parents and comunity, then receive a decent education, they would be open minded enough to have a diverse range of experiences and know who to avoid. It sounds a lot better than leaving it all up to chance of getting into Masterman or a good Catholic school.
    My brother in law moved to "Chicago" a few years ago - really to an expensive suburb of Chicago. His wife feels strongly that their son should go to "public" school, so they moved to an area with ''good public schools". My wife points out that they aren't so "public" at that point. Anyway, we were discussing school admissions and the sister in law expressed resentment that our kids needed to be tested and essentially be interviewed before they were admitted. She said that she would never submit her child to that and would never want to send him to a school where he needed to go through that. I hadn't considered it before, but my reaction was the opposite - I wouldn't want my kids to attend a school where their classmates didn't need to get over the bar to gain acceptance, to weed out the distractions and those who would disrupt the class. Thus, yes, my wife and I did leave "it all up to chance of getting into ... A good ... school". It's worked out fine and we we wouldnt have done anything differently.

    I guess my wife and I have more confidence in our children than you or my b-i-l's wife do in your own.
    Last edited by billy ross; 08-13-2012 at 05:12 PM.

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2