Sorry, just reverted to adolescence for a minute. I'm all better now.
26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error. Again, why do you believe such non-sense.
Oh-and if you don't care about anyone being gay, you're still focusing on it enough in this thread. So many sins, yet gay gay gay is all that's coming from you. Classic case of homophobia. Morals are a bit more than what hole a penis goes into.
I was always taught in sunday school that "unnatural" = felatio or sodomy
Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for sodomy and bj's . 27 In the same way the men also abandoned vaginal sex with women and were inflamed with lust for one another.
Notice "their" as in there girlfriends wives started to get "experimental" and before you know it they were getting "experimental" with men.
Kinda sounds like Libel to me. I don't buy it. Reads like some fundy slippery slope argument.
"Believing is seeing" - paraphrased from PH
So, basically Romans said that homosexuality, lust, and sexual perversions are the act of God. Cool! Thanks God!
But that's actually a good point. Is fellatio unnatural and a sin also? Is heterosexual vaginal sex for procreation the only non-sinful sex?