Register
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    ArcticSplash's Avatar
    ArcticSplash is offline Dixie Normus
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Couch Surfing in Kensington
    Posts
    11,110

    Default PA PowerSwitch Turning Turns to Failure

    Only 18% of PECO customers so far have even bothered to switch.

    The reasons are pretty obvious. The discounts aren't worth the trouble to waste one's time over, the marketing hype is ridiculous, and we all suffered the pain of having our rates jacked up just prior to dereg implementation just so these bill-stuffers could have some breathing room to act like a gas station---quick to raise the rate, slow to lower it.


    Electricity deregulation sucks.

    PUC is putting Pa.'s default system in play | Philadelphia Inquirer | 05/08/2011

  2. #2
    raider.adam is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sharswood
    Posts
    14,507

    Default

    As I understand it, the rates went up because they were held artificially low by Harrisburg for several years.

  3. #3
    Jayfar's Avatar
    Jayfar is offline Junior Old Fart
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Christian St West
    Posts
    3,230

    Default

    I saw a previous article indicating a much larger percentage of industrial customers switched.

    EDIT:

    Yes, most of the large industrial customers switched.

    Peco: 16% of customers have switched suppliers - Philly.com

    About 16 percent of Peco's 1.6 million customers, including most of its large industrial customers, have switched to alternative suppliers, according to Cathy Engel Menendez, spokeswoman for the Philadelphia utility.
    Last edited by Jayfar; 05-08-2011 at 10:21 AM.
    “Guys like you I would dispatch with my roofing axe.” -- BootsywannabeACretin

  4. #4
    ArcticSplash's Avatar
    ArcticSplash is offline Dixie Normus
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Couch Surfing in Kensington
    Posts
    11,110

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by raider.adam View Post
    As I understand it, the rates went up because they were held artificially low by Harrisburg for several years.
    Cite please?

    The PUC never pushed rates lower than the cost of production and distribution, otherwise the utilities would have gone cash poor and bankrupt. Uranium and natgas prices have been at record lows for a while now, so fuel input costs were never putting pressure on the utilities before or after dereg.

  5. #5
    ArcticSplash's Avatar
    ArcticSplash is offline Dixie Normus
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Couch Surfing in Kensington
    Posts
    11,110

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jayfar View Post
    I saw a previous article indicating a much larger percentage of industrial and customers switched.

    EDIT:

    Yes, most of the large industrial customers switched.

    Peco: 16% of customers have switched suppliers - Philly.com

    Comm and Ind customers negotiate their own electricity contracts with utilities, including regulated markets. It's always been like this. The switch puts the one-sided bidding for very large consumers at their advantage.

    However for individual residential customers, there still is no collusion power [aka a "buyers strike"] that forces rates low.

    The massive rate hike just prior to dereg that impacted residential ratepayers proves my point. Where is the monetary proof that dereg is/was/going-to-be better? The wallet doesn't lie.

  6. #6
    Malloy's Avatar
    Malloy is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    East Falls
    Posts
    5,544

    Default

    IMO 18% switch in a few months is pretty impressive (especially when you look at the dollars) I think it will continue to grow. I'm not switching, but I wouldn't call that a failure.
    Like PS on Facebook!

  7. #7
    Bob_Head's Avatar
    Bob_Head is offline Immoderat0r
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    3,287

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ArcticSplash View Post
    the marketing hype is ridiculous
    And the pyramid-scheme style way the marketing was conducted didn't help. Very few of the people selling the new options could answer many of my most basic questions. The knew price point, and nothing else. Even on price questions they were a bit weak. They really couldn't set themselves apart from all the alarm, home improvement and magazine salespeople who plague my stoop. It didn't seem like a scam, but it wasn't enough to get me to switch, either.
    Last edited by Bob_Head; 05-08-2011 at 11:11 AM.
    Jesus died for somebody's sins, but not mine.

  8. #8
    Malloy's Avatar
    Malloy is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    East Falls
    Posts
    5,544

    Default

    Agreed 10000%. VERY weak effort.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob_Head View Post
    And the pyramid-scheme style way the marketing was conducted didn't help. Very few of the people selling the new options couldn't answer many of my most basic questions. The knew price point, and nothing else. Even on price questions they were a bit weak. They really couldn't set themselves apart from all the alarm, home improvement and magazine salespeople who plague my stoop. It didn't seem like a scam, but it wasn't enough to get me to switch, either.
    Like PS on Facebook!

  9. #9
    longtimephilly is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,136

    Default

    I agree with Bob. I didn't trust any of the people ringing my doorbell Saturday morning with little information and unable to answer questions.

  10. #10
    raider.adam is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sharswood
    Posts
    14,507

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ArcticSplash View Post
    Cite please?

    The PUC never pushed rates lower than the cost of production and distribution, otherwise the utilities would have gone cash poor and bankrupt. Uranium and natgas prices have been at record lows for a while now, so fuel input costs were never putting pressure on the utilities before or after dereg.
    Electricity deregulation is a win for Pennsylvania | PennLive.com

    The utilities were rate capped for over 10 years. The rates went up because the caps came off, as was legislated to happen back in 1996.

  11. #11
    ArcticSplash's Avatar
    ArcticSplash is offline Dixie Normus
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Couch Surfing in Kensington
    Posts
    11,110

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by raider.adam View Post
    Electricity deregulation is a win for Pennsylvania | PennLive.com

    The utilities were rate capped for over 10 years. The rates went up because the caps came off, as was legislated to happen back in 1996.
    And yet natgas, the primary fuel for electricity generation, has hit unheard-of historic lows [they were higher 10 years ago].

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2