Register
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    eldondre is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    18,041

    Default Historic Edison High to give way to drive thru

    while costs may be high, I've got a bridge to sell to anyone who believes numbers the school district claims they found
    The bill that would change the zoning of the former Edison High School parcel was introduced by Seventh District Councilwoman Maria Quinones-Sanchez. “The school district still owns it, but there is a pending sale,” Gregorski said. The cost of reusing the building, which is in a state of disrepair and has asbestos issues, is prohibitive, he said. Because the building is on the National Historic Register, any developer would have to go through a historic review process if any federal funding is used, Gregorski said. But otherwise, since there is no local designation, the building can be torn down.

    Staff recommended the commission approve the zoning change, with a provision that the developer sit down with the commission to work on improving the project design. City Council could vote on the bill as soon as Thursday.

    Commissioner Nilda Iris Ruiz, who grew up in the area, said that there is a great need for senior housing there, but she, like other commissioners, were not thrilled with the drive-thru restaurant part of the equation. She also said she knew about environmental problems at the building that would make reuse expensive, and noted that the area is starting to pop with commercial activity, and this development could help that along.

    Both she and Trainer suggested the developer hold meetings with the community. “It seems like it would have a huge impact on the community,” due to its size, Trainer said.

    Trainer asked if any studies had been done looking at the cost of reusing the historic high school. Gregorski said school district officials told him this was the case.

    One community member suggested that reuse of the building, a neighborhood landmark, might be possible with grant money. An aide for councilwoman Quinones-Sanchez said that in a series of community meetings, community members also wanted to know, at first, whether the building could be reused. The council woman does not think that would be feasible through either public or private development, he said. What everyone at the meetings agreed on is that something has to be done with the building, he said, as it has been vandalized and is used for illegal activities.

    After the meeting, Planning Commission Executive Director Gary Jastrzab said that the developer would need water department, zoning and other approvals to move forward with the project. He is also hoping the commission can convince the developer to amend its plans a bit. “There is an opportunity to do something better here,” he said.

    Unless the city's new zoning code is in place before the developer is ready to move forward, persuasion is all the planning commission will be able to use. Once the plan has been adopted, a development of this size would trigger a design review process, which will give the commission more teeth, he said.
    PCPC gives OK to bills for reuse of classic pumping station; demo of historic high school | PlanPhilly: Planning Philadelphia's Future

    would be a great building to reuse even if it's for affordable senior housing. I doubt very much cheapening the built environment is going to help this area. there's already cleared land for the never happened shopping center at american (when the developer went to jail or something)
    "It has shown me that everything is illuminated in the light of the past"
    Jonathan Safran Foer

  2. #2
    registereduser is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    23

    Default

    the hood has already lost untold architectural treasures. it would be sad to see it go. it would be sad to lose such a monument to the aspirations and dreams of large scale public education.

  3. #3
    Braveheart is offline Mismember
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Upstream Village
    Posts
    1,679

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by registereduser View Post
    the hood has already lost untold architectural treasures. it would be sad to see it go. it would be sad to lose such a monument to the aspirations and dreams of large scale public education.
    Edison HS served it's time in hell, maybe it's time to let it go.

    It lost 54 former students during the Vietnam War, more than any US high school.

  4. #4
    Moonraker is offline Rocket Scientist
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,212

    Default

    Was this the same building which once house Nort'East HS or just the same land as was Nort'East?

  5. #5
    Braveheart is offline Mismember
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Upstream Village
    Posts
    1,679

    Default

    I think wikipedia said the original was at 8th and Lehigh.

  6. #6
    desolate's Avatar
    desolate is offline Double spaced
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    8,355

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eldondre View Post
    while costs may be high, I've got a bridge to sell to anyone who believes numbers the school district claims they found
    1. Your cursory knowledge of asbestos abatement is your weakness.

    2. People own the land they own, not the land next to them. A concept lost on you and Inga.
    I'm not seeing all these supposed bikes in all these million dollar bike lanes.

  7. #7
    eldondre is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    18,041

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by desolate View Post
    1. Your cursory knowledge of asbestos abatement is your weakness.

    2. People own the land they own, not the land next to them. A concept lost on you and Inga.
    meh. you've never shown the ability to understand varying shades of any concept. black or white to you. the PSD owns the land. I realize that asbestos is treated like nuclear waste by the bureaucrats. seems lie a typical "I hate hold buildings post" by desolate. it's possible that the PSD is right, but I tink you have to be pretty naive to take their word. I rarely agree with Inga so I don't see why you feel the need to throw us together.
    "It has shown me that everything is illuminated in the light of the past"
    Jonathan Safran Foer

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2