+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Specter satarizes self

  1. #1
    Illiniwek's Avatar
    Illiniwek is offline Oskee Wow Wow
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Greater Logan Square Metropolitan Area
    Posts
    2,663

    Default Specter satarizes self

    Specter rips Sestak for not being a party loyalist.
    "Congressman Sestak is a flagrant hypocrite in challenging my being a real Democrat when he did not register as a Democrat until 2006 just in time to run for Congress," Specter said in the statement.

  2. #2
    PhillyKev's Avatar
    PhillyKev is offline Super Troll
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    3,154

    Default

    I don't get it. He's pointing out what he sees as Sestak's hypocrisy for calling him "not a real democrat" based on prior party affiliation while Sestak has a similar history. He was not "ripping him for not being a party loyalist". He was ripping him for hypocrisy.

  3. #3
    dukeboards is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    306

    Default

    "Specter satarizes self"

    Looks like the Illiniwek administration is "smrat" too.

  4. #4
    Malloy's Avatar
    Malloy is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    East Falls
    Posts
    3,332

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dukeboards View Post
    "Specter satarizes self"

    Looks like the Illiniwek administration is "smrat" too.
    Sup with the personal attacks?

  5. #5
    dukeboards is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    306

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Malloy View Post
    Sup with the personal attacks?
    Check out Illiniwek's thread about typos. Don't cast stones from your glass house.

  6. #6
    phillyaggie is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    3,029

    Default

    I thought it was all in fun and not a personal "attack" per se.

    I sometimes point out others' typos or gaffes in a fun way (most recent example being on salsa's thread about his radio commentaries), knowing full well that often I too make silly mistakes while typing. It's the innernet as some folks say.
    Last edited by phillyaggie; 07-10-2009 at 06:27 PM.
    "If men loved Pimlico as mothers love children, arbitrarily, because it is THEIRS, Pimlico in a year or two might be fairer than Florence. Some readers will say that this is a mere fantasy. I answer that it is the actual history of mankind. This, as a fact is how cities did grow great...Men did not love Rome because she was great. She was great because they had loved her."

    -G.K. Chesterton

  7. #7
    five apples's Avatar
    five apples is offline Bodhisattva
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    PSquare
    Posts
    1,574

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PhillyKev View Post
    I don't get it. He's pointing out what he sees as Sestak's hypocrisy for calling him "not a real democrat" based on prior party affiliation while Sestak has a similar history. He was not "ripping him for not being a party loyalist". He was ripping him for hypocrisy.
    That is how I read it as well.

  8. #8
    dukeboards is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    306

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phillyaggie View Post
    I thought it was all in fun and not a personal "attack" per se.
    When I pointed out in that thread how off base he was, all I heard was that liberals have no sense of humor.

  9. #9
    MuscleHead's Avatar
    MuscleHead is offline Paulista
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Northeast / Bells Corner
    Posts
    1,154

    Default

    My son, a big supporter of Specter , received this email from the Specter campaign. I've copied part of it below. Look at point #2.

    Dear Supporter,

    Welcome to the first edition of the Specter 2010 campaign update. Last week was an exciting one as Senator Specter met with hundreds of Party leaders across nine counties to talk about their shared Democratic values.


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    1. "Sen. Specter always gathered support in the county," said Greg Leathers, chairman of the Greene County Democratic Committee. "He has been a friend of labor and the AFL-CIO." Leathers added that a challenger would have a hard time establishing the legitimacy and credibility that comes with a 29-year incumbent, and the senator's chances of re-election are good.
    -The Herald Standard, 7/4/09

    Senator Specter concluded another successful tour through central and western Pennsylvania last week, visiting with grassroots Democrats in nine counties. Click here to read about his visit with Adams County Democrats and click here to read more about his visit with Greene County Democrats.


    2. Rep. Joe Sestak called himself the only "true Democrat" in Pennsylvania's 2010 U.S. Senate race during a visit to Northampton County this afternoon.
    -The Express Times, 7/5/09

    That's ironic, since Sestak has only been a Democrat since 2006.

    According to records on file at the Delaware County Voter Registration office, Sestak did not register as a Democrat until February 2006. (Prior to that, he had been a lifelong Independent.) He announced his campaign for Congress, as a Democrat, in March 2006.

  10. #10
    Sailaway's Avatar
    Sailaway is offline Giggity Giggity Goo!
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Quahog, RI
    Posts
    4,115

    Default

    As intensely as I dislike Sestak, it is rather hypocritical for Specter, of all people, to accuse him of switching party loyalties. If Sestak was a registered Republican, the case could definitely be made.

    It does seem obvious that Sestak stayed an independent so he could suss out his political future and see which way the winds were blowing when he decided to run. But I tend to doubt, ideologically, Sestak, had he run under a GOP ticket, would have been any less liberal than Specter was a Republican.
    The fundamental difference between modern liberalism/progressivism and most other similar ideologies is that liberalism seeks to make everyone equally mediocre, while other ideologies seek to make others equally excellent. In other words, liberalism/progressivism rewards the worst of the worst, whereas other ideologies rewards those who actually care.

  11. #11
    Hozeramma's Avatar
    Hozeramma is offline Master Stone Cutter
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Wissahickon
    Posts
    627

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dukeboards View Post
    When I pointed out in that thread how off base he was, all I heard was that liberals have no sense of humor.
    Conservatives also have no sense of humor. Just bring up Palin.

  12. #12
    Hozeramma's Avatar
    Hozeramma is offline Master Stone Cutter
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Wissahickon
    Posts
    627

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Illiniwek View Post
    Specter rips Sestak for not being a party loyalist.
    For me, this article reinforces that Politicians will do and say just about anything for the opportunity to remain in office, especially against the individual who will be opposite them in the primary.

    The hard part is taking everything in and separating the cow from the bull

  13. #13
    Illiniwek's Avatar
    Illiniwek is offline Oskee Wow Wow
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Greater Logan Square Metropolitan Area
    Posts
    2,663

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dukeboards View Post
    "Specter satarizes self"

    Looks like the Illiniwek administration is "smrat" too.
    I prefer to think of myself as samrt.

  14. #14
    Illiniwek's Avatar
    Illiniwek is offline Oskee Wow Wow
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Greater Logan Square Metropolitan Area
    Posts
    2,663

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PhillyKev View Post
    I don't get it. He's pointing out what he sees as Sestak's hypocrisy for calling him "not a real democrat" based on prior party affiliation while Sestak has a similar history. He was not "ripping him for not being a party loyalist". He was ripping him for hypocrisy.
    Sestak was an admiral. I give him points for not declaring a party while he was a flag officer.

  15. #15
    raider.adam is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sharswood
    Posts
    7,114

    Default

    From what I recall, Sestak was an independent while he was in the military.

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.5.1 PL1