No. I'd really like to see him intelligently defend his own positions and lay out, point by point, what he has done for the country. Reverting to smear tactics just makes me not trust his track record. His record should be his strongest case, which is why he needs to be running on that. If he's not, then it just makes me think he isn't confident his own record is good enough to run on for reelection. Same goes for Romney. The less substance either of them bring to the table, the more wary I am of the both of them.
Originally Posted by Naveen
"imagination and memory are but one thing, which for diverse considerations hath diverse names" - Thomas Hobbes