Register
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Don Schneider is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    68

    Default The Penn State report and Graham Spanier, former president of PSU

    From the special investigation report issued by Louis Freeh, former Director of the F.B.I., et al:

    February 27-28, 2001:

    "Curley emails Schultz and Spanier and says he [Curley] has changed his mind about the plan after talking it over with Joe [Paterno] yesterday. Curley now proposes to tell Sandusky ‘we feel there is a problem’ and offer him ‘professional help.’ ‘If he is cooperative we would work with him to handle informing‘ the Second Mile; if Sandusky does not cooperate, ‘we don’t have a choice and will inform’ DPW and the Second Mile. ‘Additionally, I will let him know that his guests are not permitted to use out facilities.’"

    "Spnaier emails Curley and Schultz: ‘This approach is acceptable to me.’ He adds: ‘The only downside for us is if the message isn’t ‘heard’ and acted upon, and we then become vulnerable for not having reported it. But that can be assessed down the road. The approach you outline is humane and a reasonable way to proceed.’"

    From a story by Bill Dedman, Investigative Reporter, msnbc.com, July 12, 2012:

    "At no time in the more than 16 years of his presidency at Penn State was Dr. Spanier told of an incident involving Jerry Sandusky that described child abuse, sexual misconduct or criminality of any kind, and he reiterated that during his interview with Louis Freeh and his colleagues, Spanier's attorneys, Peter Vaira and Elizabeth Ainslie, said in a written statement."

    I don’t understand why Dr. Graham Spanier, former pesident of Penn State University, (and still a tenured professor on staff) would apparently have denied that he even knew of any allegations against Jerry Sandusky of sexual misconduct with children if these referred to emails in the Freeh report exist.

    Is the Dedman quote accurate? Is the Freeh report accurate regarding the emails that Dr. Spanier is claimed to have been a party to and, if so, are their substances accurate? This seems very strange.
    Last edited by Don Schneider; 07-12-2012 at 05:24 PM.

  2. #2
    Tartan69's Avatar
    Tartan69 is online now Pawn in game of life
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Fairmount/Spring Garden
    Posts
    1,113

    Default

    Spanier is a weasel. When PSU took over Dickinson Law School, he lied to the town of Carlisle about how they had no plans to move the school that was part of the fabric of the town. All the while he was planning a huge new complex in State College for the school to move to. Fortunately some good investigative reporting found out his lies. I see this Sandusky thing as just more of the same from him.

  3. #3
    Don Schneider is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    68

    Default

    But why would he lie if he knew about these emails, at least one of which came from him, discussing the allegation against Sandusky? Was he hoping they had been deleted by their recipients? If so, that seems quite a gamble by such an intelligent man. It is noted (without comment) within the Freeh report that Dr. Spanier denied any knowledge at the time (2001) of the allegation.

  4. #4
    It'sJessMe is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    441

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Don Schneider View Post
    But why would he lie if he knew about these emails, at least one of which came from him, discussing the allegation against Sandusky? Was he hoping they had been deleted by their recipients? If so, that seems quite a gamble by such an intelligent man. It is noted (without comment) within the Freeh report that Dr. Spanier denied any knowledge at the time (2001) of the allegation.
    It's amazing how people don't realize emails remain. He probably thought he wouldn't get caught.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    S. Philly/Newbold South
    Posts
    90

    Default

    I'm assuming he thought they were private and off limits. PSU struck some deal w/ the state a few yrs back were all their records were private.

  6. #6
    govtstatistic's Avatar
    govtstatistic is offline coverup public corru
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    860

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Don Schneider View Post
    But why would he lie if he knew about these emails, at least one of which came from him, discussing the allegation against Sandusky? Was he hoping they had been deleted by their recipients? If so, that seems quite a gamble by such an intelligent man. It is noted (without comment) within the Freeh report that Dr. Spanier denied any knowledge at the time (2001) of the allegation.
    Why Would He Lie. At Least that question will not be answered, Sort of like j . edgar
    And

    Drugs, guns and child porn at Homeland Security
    ACCOUNTABILITY WE CAN BELIEVE IN
    wanted for conspiring to cover up public corruption
    reward or prosecution inevitable

  7. #7
    govtstatistic's Avatar
    govtstatistic is offline coverup public corru
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    860

    Default

    Which one is Roman Polanski ?
    ACCOUNTABILITY WE CAN BELIEVE IN
    wanted for conspiring to cover up public corruption
    reward or prosecution inevitable

  8. #8
    govtstatistic's Avatar
    govtstatistic is offline coverup public corru
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    860

    Default

    I had thought i posted this before
    oh well
    Graham Spanier’s gig as a federal worker is a mystery
    ACCOUNTABILITY WE CAN BELIEVE IN
    wanted for conspiring to cover up public corruption
    reward or prosecution inevitable

  9. #9
    govtstatistic's Avatar
    govtstatistic is offline coverup public corru
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    860

    Default These kinds of things must be highly tolerated amongst we the people

    These kinds of things must be highly tolerated amongst
    a we the people society

    I guess hollywood is running the show
    but who is allowing this to begin with Or (who are we allowing to run us)

    BBC director general to meet MPs over Savile next week


    hollywood does not shame politics
    &
    politics does not shame hollywood
    where do we the people live in
    hollywood?

    Government is not show business




    Last edited by govtstatistic; 10-15-2012 at 06:33 PM.
    ACCOUNTABILITY WE CAN BELIEVE IN
    wanted for conspiring to cover up public corruption
    reward or prosecution inevitable

  10. #10
    govtstatistic's Avatar
    govtstatistic is offline coverup public corru
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    860

    Default

    Sources: Graham Spanier charged in Jerry Sandusky case
    anyone wanna bet they dissappear like like carl green
    or the ackermann
    so goes Pa politics


    Graham Spanier’s gig as a federal worker is a mystery

    this news and a buck and a half will get you a cup of coffee on a cold day
    ACCOUNTABILITY WE CAN BELIEVE IN
    wanted for conspiring to cover up public corruption
    reward or prosecution inevitable

  11. #11
    govtstatistic's Avatar
    govtstatistic is offline coverup public corru
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    860

    Default

    Are we (the U.S.) trying to look like britain
    or is britain
    trying to look like Penn State?

    BBC inquiry into Jimmy Savile scandal 'to stay secret
    ACCOUNTABILITY WE CAN BELIEVE IN
    wanted for conspiring to cover up public corruption
    reward or prosecution inevitable

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2