Register
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 140
  1. #1
    ArcticSplash's Avatar
    ArcticSplash is offline Dixie Normus
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Couch Surfing in Kensington
    Posts
    11,110

    Default Click Here to See How Much Your Property Taxes Will Go Up


  2. #2
    annie's Avatar
    annie is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    West Philly
    Posts
    2,292

    Default

    More than double or more than triple. Expected.

  3. #3
    gren's Avatar
    gren is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Walnut Hill
    Posts
    2,168

    Default

    The spreadsheet puts "Proposed Admin No Smoothing" at 1.463% of actual value. I remember Squilla talking about 1% of actual value. I guess that's the problem that you can't really discuss millage in terms of revenue neutral until you know the aggregate value of all parcels.

    Here's Philly Clout's article on Green's proposal.
    Last edited by gren; 05-21-2012 at 03:36 PM.

  4. #4
    NickTheCage is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,548

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by annie View Post
    More than double or more than triple. Expected.
    Does that bother you?

  5. #5
    annie's Avatar
    annie is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    West Philly
    Posts
    2,292

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NickTheCage View Post
    Does that bother you?
    Nope.

  6. #6
    seand is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    8,478

    Default

    How are we supposed to judge whether our "actual value" estimate is the same one the OCP will send out?

  7. #7
    NickTheCage is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,548

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by annie View Post
    Nope.
    Why not?

  8. #8
    hkp
    hkp is offline Señor Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Bella Vista
    Posts
    1,684

    Default

    I have 9.5 years to go on my tax abatement. I'll worry about it in 2022.

  9. #9
    raider.adam is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sharswood
    Posts
    14,507

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seand View Post
    How are we supposed to judge whether our "actual value" estimate is the same one the OCP will send out?
    You mean OPA? We don't and that is one of the problems with what Nutter is doing. He wants us to give him the benefit of the doubt the numbers will be right.

  10. #10
    seand is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    8,478

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NickTheCage View Post
    Why not?
    Because its better to tag the bill to something that at least has some relation to something objectively compare it to. Because part of the reason ours is going up is because a lot of other people's are going down. Because the more reality-based pricing for folks leaving houses empty on our block is going to give the last couple of abandonneds more of an incentive to actually fix or sell their empty house they inheritted, not to toy around with "meaning to" forever. Because good schools do cost money and people will likely value something a little more once they pay the "real price" for it.

    These are guesses on my part.
    Last edited by seand; 05-21-2012 at 03:54 PM.

  11. #11
    seand is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    8,478

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by raider.adam View Post
    You mean OPA? We don't and that is one of the problems with what Nutter is doing. He wants us to give him the benefit of the doubt the numbers will be right.
    If they are roughly right but say 10% off one way or the other it has a tremendous impact on this formula.

    I'm just saying that minus the most important piece of information, this tool is not that super accurate.
    Last edited by seand; 05-21-2012 at 03:58 PM.

  12. #12
    NickTheCage is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,548

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seand View Post
    Because its better to tag the bill to something that at least has some relation to something objectively compare it to. Because part of the reason ours is going up is because a lot of other people's are going down.
    I’m just asking b/ I live in the burbs .. whose property taxes are going down?



    Quote Originally Posted by seand View Post
    Because the more reality-based pricing for folks leaving houses empty on our block is going to give the last couple of abandonneds more of an incentive to actually fix or sell their empty house they inheritted, not to toy around with "meaning to" forever
    How does raising taxes give an owner of an abandoned home (or investor) and incentive to invest (fix up) said house and sell it? Doesn’t the higher tax bill increase the cost of owning the home?



    Quote Originally Posted by seand View Post
    Because good schools do cost money and people will likely value something a little more once they pay the "real price" for it.
    Does throwing more money at a problem automatically increase the quality of the problem?

  13. #13
    NickTheCage is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,548

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hkp View Post
    I have 9.5 years to go on my tax abatement. I'll worry about it in 2022.
    Why worry?

    Doesn't higher taxes benefit society?

  14. #14
    raider.adam is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sharswood
    Posts
    14,507

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seand View Post
    If they are roughly right but say 10% off one way or the other it has a tremendous impact on this formula.

    I'm just saying that minus the most important piece of information, this tool is not that super accurate.
    It was never claimed to be an official tool. It is not based on official assement numbers. It is for people to get an idea of what is taking place and how different pieces of legislation could affect them.

    Quote Originally Posted by NickTheCage View Post
    I’m just asking b/ I live in the burbs .. whose property taxes are going down?
    The people who have been over assessed.

    Does throwing more money at a problem automatically increase the quality of the problem?
    The assessments are a separate issue from the increased taxes Nutter wants.

  15. #15
    seand is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    8,478

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NickTheCage View Post
    I’m just asking b/ I live in the burbs .. whose property taxes are going down?
    Everybody in the non-gentrifying neighborhoods. Lots of NE Philly.



    Quote Originally Posted by NickTheCage View Post
    How does raising taxes give an owner of an abandoned home (or investor) and incentive to invest (fix up) said house and sell it? Doesn’t the higher tax bill increase the cost of the home?
    It increases the cost to let it sit considerably. Annie or my taxes might double (gentrifying neighborhood, purchases in the last 5 years) but the heirs who have been letting their relative's old house sit empty for 30 years will suddenly see their lets say $500 tax bill go up 6 or 7 fold to something closer to what they pay in the suburbs and they have a strong incentive to no continue to blow off unloading it to someone who does want to fix it and live there.

    Quote Originally Posted by NickTheCage View Post
    Does throwing more money at a problem automatically increase the quality of the problem?
    No but previous mismanagement and debt does negate that per-pupil funding is part of current problem. These are drastic times for the school district and while we differ on the solution, quality education costs money - period. Politically its unlikely the state is going to return to a system where it compensates for poorer non-suburban school districts as much as it did under Rendell any time soon. Annie is a big education advocate.

    Also many folks feel like Philly shifting some of its tax burden to something stable like property taxes and away from wage and business taxes will stop the loss of jobs.
    Last edited by seand; 05-21-2012 at 04:16 PM.

  16. #16
    NickTheCage is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,548

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by raider.adam View Post
    The assessments are a separate issue from the increased taxes Nutter wants.
    I was just addressing seand when he said good schools do cost money

  17. #17
    annie's Avatar
    annie is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    West Philly
    Posts
    2,292

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seand View Post
    These are guesses on my part.
    Good ones, too.

    Quote Originally Posted by NickTheCage View Post
    How does raising taxes give an owner of an abandoned home (or investor) and incentive to invest (fix up) said house and sell it? Doesn’t the higher tax bill increase the cost of owning the home?
    There are a couple houses on our block (Sean and I live on the same block) that are vacant and the owning families have been dicking around for years or decades "renovating" them. Not even the housing bubble motivated them to make real progress. A double or triple in taxes may be the final kick in the pants for them to give up and sell already. I'm frankly tired of people driving in from Jersey once a summer to cut the grass and tell me how nice the neighborhood "used' to be with its delis and dancehalls meanwhile it is their house that's a mess.

    The main reason it doesn't bother me is that I knew this would happen eventually when I bought the house and factored that in when making the purchase. I have no desire to own a house in the suburbs nor could I really afford to.

    Taxes have never been something that gets my blood pressure up. They just don't. I'm sure I seem as alien to you as you do to me.

    Quote Originally Posted by NickTheCage View Post
    Does throwing more money at a problem automatically increase the quality of the problem?
    Not automatically, no. But if spent wisely it can help and I do advocate for the district to put more of its money where it counts which is the classroom.

  18. #18
    raider.adam is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sharswood
    Posts
    14,507

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by annie View Post
    Not automatically, no. But if spent wisely it can help and I do advocate for the district to put more of its money where it counts which is the classroom.
    Or into the Parks Activity Fund

  19. #19
    seand is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    8,478

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by annie View Post

    There are a couple houses on our block (Sean and I live on the same block) that are vacant and the owning families have been dicking around for years or decades "renovating" them. Not even the housing bubble motivated them to make real progress. A double or triple in taxes may be the final kick in the pants for them to give up and sell already. I'm frankly tired of people driving in from Jersey once a summer to cut the grass and tell me how nice the neighborhood "used' to be with its delis and dancehalls meanwhile it is their house that's a mess.
    Way off topic but were you around when the one family complained about the raised bed flower garden that our neighbors had guerilla planted in their front lawn? They freaked out and compared the wooden frame of raised bed to the "slave ships my ancestors came on", even though the sides had been painted in bright colors by some of the older kids on the block (who on our block are predominantly African American, with a more mixed batch of todler-aged kids). I would not mind at all if those absentee heirs sold.

  20. #20
    NickTheCage is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,548

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by annie View Post
    There are a couple houses on our block (Sean and I live on the same block) that are vacant and the owning families have been dicking around for years or decades "renovating" them. Not even the housing bubble motivated them to make real progress. A double or triple in taxes may be the final kick in the pants for them to give up and sell already. I'm frankly tired of people driving in from Jersey once a summer to cut the grass and tell me how nice the neighborhood "used' to be with its delis and dancehalls meanwhile it is their house that's a mess.
    Well believe it or not I do I agree on the incentive to fix up and sell it b/ now it is more expensive to let it sit there. You still have the problem of pricing yourself out of the market b/ the home becomes to expensive for someone to own



    Quote Originally Posted by annie View Post
    Taxes have never been something that gets my blood pressure up. They just don't. I'm sure I seem as alien to you as you do to me.
    Yes very alien (lol).



    Quote Originally Posted by annie View Post
    Not automatically, no. But if spent wisely it can help and I do advocate for the district to put more of its money where it counts which is the classroom.
    When you say putting money in the classroom, what do you mean by that?

    Seand wrote something abt you being involved in schools. If you don't mind me asking what do you do for schools?

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2