Register
+ Reply to Thread
Page 19 of 35 FirstFirst ... 9171819202129 ... LastLast
Results 361 to 380 of 689
  1. #361
    eldondre is online now Moderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    17,891

    Default

    could be any of those guys...doubt it trades anywhere near that price. tony goldman owned it about ten years ago..it kept getting flipped for more money..in some ways a victim of the re boom
    "It has shown me that everything is illuminated in the light of the past"
    Jonathan Safran Foer

  2. #362
    mja
    mja is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Fairmount
    Posts
    47

    Default

    I'm sure the neighborhood people didn't help, but I find it more likely that the recession did far more to kill any potential development than requests for scholarships. The owner says as much in the article.

    And can we not just call out the poor West Poplar folks? Uppity bo-bo's from SG & Fairmount ended up killing the Barnes tower in its infancy because of the horrific dangers of shadows and we're left with half of a motel in a prime location. At least the West Poplar folks were worried about their continued ability to be able to afford to reside in the neighborhood instead of a rather trivial bit of shade.

    All that said, yes, I'd rather the city not cater to neighborhood groups at it's own expense, particularly those aligned with folks futilely trying to resist gentrification, but I don't see any point in demonizing people who just want to be able to live in their own neighborhood.

  3. #363
    Titus is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,373

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mja View Post

    All that said, yes, I'd rather the city not cater to neighborhood groups at it's own expense, particularly those aligned with folks futilely trying to resist gentrification, but I don't see any point in demonizing people who just want to be able to live in their own neighborhood.
    OI agree they ought not be demonized if they merely want to live in their own neighborhood, but like many others they have no right to prevent others from living there as well (I'm talking to you "North" Chinatown folks). None of us "owns" our neighborhoods.

  4. #364
    torts is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,357

    Default

    Robbery, stabbing in Fairmount Park

    "A 32-year-old man who lives in the area was walking in the 2700 block of Pennsylvania Avenue at about 4:35 a.m. when a man came up behind him and pressed an object into his back, saying it was a gun, police said."

  5. #365
    Jayfar's Avatar
    Jayfar is offline Junior Old Fart
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Christian St West
    Posts
    3,082

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by torts View Post
    Robbery, stabbing in Fairmount Park

    "A 32-year-old man who lives in the area was walking in the 2700 block of Pennsylvania Avenue at about 4:35 a.m. when a man came up behind him and pressed an object into his back, saying it was a gun, police said."
    Gee, that's only about a mile from the Divine Lorraine.
    “Guys like you I would dispatch with my roofing axe.” -- BootsywannabeACretin

  6. #366
    mixiboi's Avatar
    mixiboi is offline Philly Remixed
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Lawncrest
    Posts
    8,178

    Default

    Anyway back to the story:

    Potential buyer found for Divine Lorraine Hotel

    The current owners owe the city $702,779.82 in back taxes and defaulted on a construction loan from the union-owned Amalgamated Bank of New York.


    Im sure the city and the bank would love to see that money...
    Last edited by mixiboi; 02-11-2012 at 10:33 PM.
    Graphic Designer, Social Media Consultant. Twitter: @Sdlaugh

  7. #367
    DCnPhilly's Avatar
    DCnPhilly is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Chinatown
    Posts
    2,769

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mixiboi View Post
    Anyway back to the story:

    Potential buyer found for Divine Lorraine Hotel

    The current owners owe the city $702,779.82 in back taxes and defaulted on a construction loan from the union-owned Amalgamated Bank of New York.


    Im sure the sity and the bank would love to see that money...
    I know it's more complicated than this, but it's my knee jerk reaction. If the city wants the $700K, reposess it from the tax dodgers and flip it to Blatstein (or any of a dozen developers) for $2M. The city makes a profit, and the owner doesn't have too much invested to inhibit a profit.
    Turn on the Lights at Market East!

    @mrwrightnow1: Mayor we need to get a campaign on littering in this city?
    @Michael_Nutter: We have one...Unlitter Us spoken word artists

    Obviously it isn't working.

  8. #368
    raider.adam is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sharswood
    Posts
    14,378

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DCnPhilly View Post
    I know it's more complicated than this, but it's my knee jerk reaction. If the city wants the $700K, reposess it from the tax dodgers and flip it to Blatstein (or any of a dozen developers) for $2M. The city makes a profit, and the owner doesn't have too much invested to inhibit a profit.
    Actually, tax sales don't work that way. If a property goes to sheriff sale, when the property goes for more than the money owed to the City, the owner gets the difference*. Of course not to distract from your main point. That property should have went to sheriff sale a very long time ago.

    *Well, by LAW they get the difference, but as we have found out from the corruption in the Sheriff's office and complete craptastic and probably illegal actions of Sheriff Green, the City hasn't been returning the money and instead hiding the lost money in bad accounting.

  9. #369
    DCnPhilly's Avatar
    DCnPhilly is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Chinatown
    Posts
    2,769

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by raider.adam View Post
    Actually, tax sales don't work that way. If a property goes to sheriff sale, when the property goes for more than the money owed to the City, the owner gets the difference*. Of course not to distract from your main point. That property should have went to sheriff sale a very long time ago.

    *Well, by LAW they get the difference, but as we have found out from the corruption in the Sheriff's office and complete craptastic and probably illegal actions of Sheriff Green, the City hasn't been returning the money and instead hiding the lost money in bad accounting.

    Lovely. Another layer of nonsense. I know I've said this before, but it's amazing how much money we pi$$ away to keep electing these ingrates.
    Turn on the Lights at Market East!

    @mrwrightnow1: Mayor we need to get a campaign on littering in this city?
    @Michael_Nutter: We have one...Unlitter Us spoken word artists

    Obviously it isn't working.

  10. #370
    raider.adam is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sharswood
    Posts
    14,378

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DCnPhilly View Post
    Lovely. Another layer of nonsense. I know I've said this before, but it's amazing how much money we pi$$ away to keep electing these ingrates.
    Sheriff's Office may owe millions in unclaimed auction proceeds - Philly.com

  11. #371
    DCnPhilly's Avatar
    DCnPhilly is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Chinatown
    Posts
    2,769

    Default

    Oh, Philadelphia. This could turn into one very expensive a$$ ache. I'm glad we're calling out corrupt officials, but if people start stepping forward for their money, it could cost a fortune the city doesn't have.
    Turn on the Lights at Market East!

    @mrwrightnow1: Mayor we need to get a campaign on littering in this city?
    @Michael_Nutter: We have one...Unlitter Us spoken word artists

    Obviously it isn't working.

  12. #372
    raider.adam is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sharswood
    Posts
    14,378

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DCnPhilly View Post
    Oh, Philadelphia. This could turn into one very expensive a$$ ache. I'm glad we're calling out corrupt officials, but if people start stepping forward for their money, it could cost a fortune the city doesn't have.
    Sadly, we aren't calling them out. He retired and that is when the forensic audits started. Harrisburg screwed up because they didn't freak out when money and reports stopped. Alan Butkovitz the City Controller screwed up because he didn't audit the office like he is supposed to every year.

    Ok, enough of me hijacking the thread. Back to the Divine Lorraine...

  13. #373
    the mule's Avatar
    the mule is offline Tumescent Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    802

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MariusPontmercy View Post
    Nutter: PGW, Divine Lorraine hotel could be sold

    Sounds like Darrel Clarke wants to get his greasy hands on the Divine Lorraine and jam some affordable housing into it.

    Stupendous.

    However they could justify the cost of turning the Divine Lorraine into low income housing is beyond me. It'd be easier to just build from scratch probably.
    A thorough historical rehab of the Divine Lorraine would take every penny of $50 million, if not more. The last proposal for the property incorporated low income senior housing on the bottom half of the property and market rate apartments on the upper floors. A very successful, very well known affordable housing developer wasn't able to make their numbers work before the deadline for LIHTC applications this fall. So getting tax credit financing and $3.4 million from the city, which is much better financing terms for the rehab than any private developer would get, still was not enough to make the project viable. Poo poo affordable housing all you want, and you have good reasons for doing so, but it will be VERY surprising if a private developer is able to make this project work without any subsidies.

    I'd love to see a faithful restoration of this building without it being encumbered long term with affordability requirements. It's an embarrassment for it to sit there crumbling so close to the heart of our city and certainly is impeding surrounding development on North Broad. It's easy for politicians to talk about this project happening; they just have to put their money where their mouths are if they ever want to see it go forward. Affordable housing or not, whatever developer ultimately makes this happen is going to have to get a sweetheart deal from the city to get it started.

  14. #374
    eldondre is online now Moderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    17,891

    Default

    take it by eminent domain and sell it off with a requirement that it must
    be renovated at least partually within two years...even if it means seling it below 700k. iy cant hurt that the new owner wony have overpaid for the property. we need to move on from the hack that owns it now. gutting it and leaving it open to the elements was despicable..
    still, i guess its not the only property thats taken years to get cleared off the banks books as a loss. anyway it aeems like a good use of rcap funds if there ever was one
    "It has shown me that everything is illuminated in the light of the past"
    Jonathan Safran Foer

  15. #375
    raider.adam is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sharswood
    Posts
    14,378

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eldondre View Post
    take it by eminent domain and sell it off with a requirement that it must
    be renovated at least partually within two years...even if it means seling it below 700k. iy cant hurt that the new owner wony have overpaid for the property. we need to move on from the hack that owns it now. gutting it and leaving it open to the elements was despicable..
    still, i guess its not the only property thats taken years to get cleared off the banks books as a loss. anyway it aeems like a good use of rcap funds if there ever was one

    The government still has to pay for the value of the property.

  16. #376
    Jayfar's Avatar
    Jayfar is offline Junior Old Fart
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Christian St West
    Posts
    3,082

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Goodman View Post
    lol Blatstein is probably involved in this too. Or Blumenfeld. I feel like it would be one of those guys that are heavily invested in N Broad.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jayfar View Post
    If I recall correctly, Blumenfeld was already in and out of the DL. I was thinking Blatstein or maybe Orens Bros. Or Dranoff.

    EDIT:

    Yep, Eric Blumenfeld bought the DL in 2005.
    Naked Philly calls the odds in the same order I did and adds a few other possible long-shot possibilities.

    Laying Odds: Who’s Buying the Divine Lorraine? | NakedPhilly
    “Guys like you I would dispatch with my roofing axe.” -- BootsywannabeACretin

  17. #377
    palvar's Avatar
    palvar is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Passyunk Square
    Posts
    660

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mja View Post
    At least the West Poplar folks were worried about their continued ability to be able to afford to reside in the neighborhood...
    Isn't there public housing a block away from this building?
    Last edited by palvar; 02-13-2012 at 11:32 AM. Reason: Typo in HTML

  18. #378
    eldondre is online now Moderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    17,891

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by raider.adam View Post
    The government still has to pay for the value of the property.
    that's the question I guess, what's the value given the building must be fixed up?
    "It has shown me that everything is illuminated in the light of the past"
    Jonathan Safran Foer

  19. #379
    mja
    mja is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Fairmount
    Posts
    47

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by palvar View Post
    Isn't there public housing a block away from this building?
    Yes, there is. Does that fact mean they don't have a stake in their neighborhood?

    Again, I have no desire to cater to these people, but I sincerely doubt they had any real impact in derailing this particular project. The collapse of the financial system seems a far more likely culprit.

  20. #380
    raider.adam is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sharswood
    Posts
    14,378

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eldondre View Post
    that's the question I guess, what's the value given the building must be fixed up?
    The starting point would likely be the last sale price minus back taxes.

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2