Register
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 71
  1. #21
    MariusPontmercy's Avatar
    MariusPontmercy is offline poor grad student
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Cedar Park
    Posts
    1,327

    Default

    Ten dollars says it gets demolished and a "mixed income" housing development goes up on the lot. Ultimately being a net loss of taxpayer money and ensuring petty crime, drug dealing, quality of life issues, garbage and blight stick around Broad and Fairmount for decades to come.
    "imagination and memory are but one thing, which for diverse considerations hath diverse names" - Thomas Hobbes

  2. #22
    OffenseTaken's Avatar
    OffenseTaken is offline Junior Dilettante
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,570

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MariusPontmercy View Post
    Ten dollars says it gets demolished and a "mixed income" housing development goes up on the lot. Ultimately being a net loss of taxpayer money and ensuring petty crime, drug dealing, quality of life issues, garbage and blight stick around Broad and Fairmount for decades to come.
    Middling-quality PHA schlock sounds like a fantastic improvement over what's there right now.

  3. #23
    MariusPontmercy's Avatar
    MariusPontmercy is offline poor grad student
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Cedar Park
    Posts
    1,327

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OffenseTaken View Post
    Middling-quality PHA schlock sounds like a fantastic improvement over what's there right now.
    Personally I'd rather have a vacant lot. At least it would still have potential.
    "imagination and memory are but one thing, which for diverse considerations hath diverse names" - Thomas Hobbes

  4. #24
    Titus is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,372

  5. #25
    John Goodman is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    washington square west
    Posts
    702

  6. #26
    AbortedWalrus's Avatar
    AbortedWalrus is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    1,003

    Default

    Great news, but I hope that school project isn't what gets done. I'd rather see condos and commercial there personally.

  7. #27
    raider.adam is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sharswood
    Posts
    14,341

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AbortedWalrus View Post
    Great news, but I hope that school project isn't what gets done. I'd rather see condos and commercial there personally.
    Yeah, a school is rather unexciting, especially since they have that hulk on Broad several blocks up.

  8. #28
    AbortedWalrus's Avatar
    AbortedWalrus is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    1,003

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by raider.adam View Post
    Yeah, a school is rather unexciting, especially since they have that hulk on Broad several blocks up.
    Supposedly that would get closed. But yeah, the boring is the thing. It's because of my age, but I don't want to live in a boring family oriented neighborhood.

  9. #29
    raider.adam is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sharswood
    Posts
    14,341

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AbortedWalrus View Post
    But yeah, the boring is the thing. It's because of my age, but I don't want to live in a boring family oriented neighborhood.
    Not sure what you mean.

  10. #30
    AbortedWalrus's Avatar
    AbortedWalrus is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    1,003

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by raider.adam View Post
    Not sure what you mean.
    I live on Fairmount and walk in the area a lot. The vast majority of the residents I see and have met don't have kids. If the schools for the catchment really improve under that plan I can't help but feel it would turn from all recent college grads to middle aged families seeking a nice neighborhood with a good school. I'm young enough that I'd rather see more nightlife and less family oriented stuff. I'll take either one, obviously, but if I could have my wish I'd rather the neighborhood was hip and exciting with good nightlife more than anything.

  11. #31
    raider.adam is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sharswood
    Posts
    14,341

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AbortedWalrus View Post
    I live on Fairmount and walk in the area a lot. The vast majority of the residents I see and have met don't have kids. If the schools for the catchment really improve under that plan I can't help but feel it would turn from all recent college grads to middle aged families seeking a nice neighborhood with a good school. I'm young enough that I'd rather see more nightlife and less family oriented stuff. I'll take either one, obviously, but if I could have my wish I'd rather the neighborhood was hip and exciting with good nightlife more than anything.
    Why do you think the schools will improve just because it is a newly built school? Is there something about the plan I am missing?

  12. #32
    the mule's Avatar
    the mule is offline Tumescent Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    795

    Default

    Well I'll be damned. I'll keep my expectations in check, but this is much better news than expected. There were some serious rumblings of another potential buyer whose project would have left people gnashing their teeth.

    We know Blumenfeld wanted the land all along (the most valuable part), so let's hope this actually results in the redevelopment of the building first and not just a move to develop the land (which would also be good at some point).

  13. #33
    BarryG is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    South Philly
    Posts
    5,971

    Default

    They are saying market rate housing plus commercial

    Phila. developer aiming to buy blighted landmark Divine Lorraine

  14. #34
    Titus is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,372

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BarryG View Post
    They are saying market rate housing plus commercial

    Phila. developer aiming to buy blighted landmark Divine Lorraine
    From their lips to God's ears!

  15. #35
    carloss's Avatar
    carloss is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    South Philly
    Posts
    304

    Default

    He's trying to buy it BACK, which raises the question of why he even sold it off to deadbeat investors to begin with if he was so serious about restoring it.

    I wish I could be more optimistic. I think it'll come down to Blumenfeld trying to milk as many funds from City Hall and Harrisburg as he can for the restoration. City Hall and Harrisburg will balk and taxpayer outrage (some of it justifiable) will seal the death of the project. I would love to see restoration come about from philanthropic efforts; a non-profit redevelopment would be the surest way to make it happen, if only the munificence was out there. (I'm thinking of the $40 million Gerry Lenfest just tossed out to the American Revolution Museum, whose architecture will be considerably more boring than this building.) Housing is still a non-starter because of the location.

    So, not the ideal development, but Blumenfeld's restoration record is respectable enough, so I guess it could be worse.
    "When I see an adult on a bicycle, I no longer despair for the future of the human race." H.G. Wells


    The Uncanny Valley

  16. #36
    raider.adam is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sharswood
    Posts
    14,341

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by carloss View Post
    He's trying to buy it BACK, which raises the question of why he even sold it off to deadbeat investors to begin with if he was so serious about restoring it.
    Well, if you sold something for $X and can later buy it back for $X - 10...

  17. #37
    BarryG is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    South Philly
    Posts
    5,971

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by carloss View Post
    He's trying to buy it BACK, which raises the question of why he even sold it off to deadbeat investors to begin with if he was so serious about restoring it.

    I wish I could be more optimistic. I think it'll come down to Blumenfeld trying to milk as many funds from City Hall and Harrisburg as he can for the restoration. City Hall and Harrisburg will balk and taxpayer outrage (some of it justifiable) will seal the death of the project. I would love to see restoration come about from philanthropic efforts; a non-profit redevelopment would be the surest way to make it happen, if only the munificence was out there. (I'm thinking of the $40 million Gerry Lenfest just tossed out to the American Revolution Museum, whose architecture will be considerably more boring than this building.) Housing is still a non-starter because of the location.

    So, not the ideal development, but Blumenfeld's restoration record is respectable enough, so I guess it could be worse.
    Seems like City Hall is ready to cut a deal -- like forgive most of the back taxes.

  18. #38
    raider.adam is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sharswood
    Posts
    14,341

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BarryG View Post
    Seems like City Hall is ready to cut a deal -- like forgive most of the back taxes.
    If it goes to sheriff sale, it would wipe it.

  19. #39
    Titus is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,372

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by carloss View Post
    Housing is still a non-starter because of the location.

    So, not the ideal development, but Blumenfeld's restoration record is respectable enough, so I guess it could be worse.
    Yeah, but the reason housing remains a problem at that location is this very building, which if restored, would be a game changer.

  20. #40
    AbortedWalrus's Avatar
    AbortedWalrus is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    1,003

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by raider.adam View Post
    Why do you think the schools will improve just because it is a newly built school? Is there something about the plan I am missing?
    I figured that if that plan did happen it would be such a big deal that it would get extra money thrown at it. I mean, a Vetri cafeteria? It'd be big news, plus they wanted to put Masterman and such in there which is already a great school, so the Masterman folks would make demands saying the other schools needed to either be brought up to their level so as not to bring them down, or they would try to back out of the plan, etc. There's nothing about the plan itself, per se, just my personal speculation about what would have happened around the plan.

    But it's moot now!

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2