Register
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 38 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 747
  1. #1
    cubanChris is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    117

    Default Market East Transformation?

    So I saw this on Philly Biz Journals this AM...

    Two of the largest landlords along East Market Street are planning to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to breath new life into a worn-down section of Center City stretching from 12th Street to the cusp of the Historic District.
    Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust anticipates spending more than $100 million in a phased project transforming the Gallery into a modern, upscale urban mall with more eateries and retailers that appeal to consumers who are fashion-conscious and keep up with style trends. The building would be turned inside out with storefronts overlooking Market Street. PREIT would like to begin next ...
    Plans unveiled for E. Market | Philadelphia Business Journal

    Unfortunately it cuts off behind a pay wall right at the end there. Hopefully someone is subscriber and able to relay that info.

    Could it be the long awaited Market East Renaissance? Screw SCRUB, throw up some crazy billboards and dump that money back into the corridor quick!

  2. #2
    Bleeper's Avatar
    Bleeper is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    569

    Default

    Not a fan of malls in the middle of an urban experience like Center City.

    They can dress up that albatross all they like but those 200-300 businesses should be out on Market Street,Chestnut Street, 11th + 12th streets helping improve the slouchy streetscape..

    Quiet as kept, 1/2 of the businesses in Market East need to be evicted and moved to Camden,Chester or Kensington.
    Hospitalitygirl-"Ok, if I had the power I would ban your ridiculous ass. SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP."

    Moderator can we ban this A-Hole please

    It appears I may have annoyed The Queen.

  3. #3
    desolate's Avatar
    desolate is offline Double spaced
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    8,355

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bleeper View Post
    Not a fan of malls in the middle of an urban experience like Center City.

    They can dress up that albatross all they like but those 200-300 businesses should be out on Market Street,Chestnut Street, 11th + 12th streets helping improve the slouchy streetscape..

    Quiet as kept, 1/2 of the businesses in Market East need to be evicted and moved to Camden,Chester or Kensington.
    Stores don't like to live in old beater "historic" storefronts.

    THey do like retail shells.

    The gallery, is still a standard retail shell.

    WHen a business has the option, they choose the shell over a 19th Centuty Brownstone with steps, no parking and piss poor electric, digital, etc.
    I'm not seeing all these supposed bikes in all these million dollar bike lanes.

  4. #4
    y.lama is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    South Broad (SoBro)
    Posts
    400

    Default

    can anyone post the full article? Looks like you need a premium account to read the whole thing. It sounds like a step in the right direction to me, the part about turning it inside out to market street was definitely on my wish list. I am one of the people that thinks the Gallery can be modified instead of torn down and rebuilt - what's the point of tearing something down when we already have an empty lot at 8th and Market.

    If the economy can turn around and/or the city can become more buisness friendly - building high rise office on top of the Gallery would be great. Then there would be a need for more residential in the area too.

    as for evicting the businesses let the market/rents take care of that. there's no point forcing the issue by taking out successful stores to put in high class stores that will not be successful

  5. #5
    bryson662001's Avatar
    bryson662001 is offline BeenThere,DoneThat
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Obnoxious in my Rittenhouse area hi-rise
    Posts
    667

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bleeper View Post
    Not a fan of malls in the middle of an urban experience like Center City.

    They can dress up that albatross all they like but those 200-300 businesses should be out on Market Street,Chestnut Street, 11th + 12th streets helping improve the slouchy streetscape..

    Quiet as kept, 1/2 of the businesses in Market East need to be evicted and moved to Camden,Chester or Kensington.
    All of the best cbd's in North America have one or more enclosed shopping malls. It's just part of the mix that makes a downtown complete. This sentence kind of throws up a red flaf though.......what do you suppose they mean by that?
    "eateries and retailers that appeal to consumers who are fashion-conscious and keep up with style trends"
    Forget it Jake.....it's MARKET EAST
    Organised religion is the root of all the evil in the world!

  6. #6
    westphillylove is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Hey. My name is Will. I'm new to the site. Here is the full article from the Philadelphia Business Journal.


    Plans unveiled for E. Market
    Premium Article - ALL ACCESS PASS provided by Amex OPEN | Subscribe now for uninterupted full access
    Date: Friday, December 10, 2010, 6:00am EST .Related:
    Commercial Real Estate, Retailing & Restaurants .Enlarge Image

    Curt Hudson
    East Market Street.
    . .Related News
    Plans unveiled for E. Market
    Army-Navy and its economic impact returns to Phila.
    The fine print: Farmers Insurance enters Phila.
    Women of Distinction: The Judges
    Convention Center parking may be eased
    .Two of the largest landlords along East Market Street are planning to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to breath new life into a worn-down section of Center City stretching from 12th Street to the cusp of the Historic District.

    Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust anticipates spending more than $100 million in a phased project transforming the Gallery into a modern, upscale urban mall with more eateries and retailers that appeal to consumers who are fashion-conscious and keep up with style trends. The building would be turned inside out with storefronts overlooking Market Street. PREIT would like to begin next year.

    SSH Real Estate, Young Capital and JOSS Realty Partners, the partnership that owns 1100 E. Market St., would raze the dated, squatty building occupying the site and construct a $75 million, four-story retail building that may, depending on market forces, incorporate an estimated $300 million convention-style hotel that would stand 27 stories with 700 to 800 rooms. It would be the first of the four Girard Square buildings to get redeveloped.

    While not as far along as PREIT and the partnership owning Girard Square, Goldenberg Group Inc. is working to piece together a mixed-use project on a surface parking lot at 8th and Market streets. In 2004, during the heady days of the real estate boom, it unveiled a $200 million plan for the site.

    “It would be multiple levels and on a grand scale,” said Robert Freedman, senior partner and general counsel at the company, about what it continues to envision. “We look at the property as the centerpiece of Market Street East. We think because of both the size of the property — two acres — as well as the location that it really deserves something special.”

    Such development activity is considered long overdue for Market East, which is, in some parts, a tired dead zone between City Hall and the historic area, and a drag on that part of the city in spite of having an enormous amount of daily foot traffic from commuters, tourists, conventioneers and downtown residents.

    Both PREIT and the Girard partnership say that in order for the projects to move forward they need a new sign district formed along that part of Market Street that would allow high-tech animated billboards on their buildings. Revenue generated from the billboard advertising would help cover a portion of their development costs.

    It could have other benefits, according to Freedman of Goldenberg.

    “Certainly better, livelier and brighter signage can be helpful to attract new stores and restaurants to the area and make these blocks a more inviting shopping and entertainment destination,” he said. “We are dealing with several national tenants interested in this location, and more flexible signage options and a more dramatic streetscape would be considered a plus for them to locate here.”

    A bill to establish the district between 7th and 13th streets was introduced by City Councilmen James Kenney and Frank DiCicco. It would only apply to buildings that are substantially redeveloped or new construction and the size of the billboards would be restricted. It is being reviewed by city planners. A hearing scheduled before the planning commission last month was postponed for further review and a new hearing set for next month.

    The measure is expected to be controversial. Some observers believe this type of sign district would make Market East look gaudy and glitzy like Times Square and diminish the historical nature of buildings, potentially harming the Independence Mall area. Residential neighbors worry the bright signs will be an obnoxious intrusion to their homes.

    “There’s so much misinterpretation out there,” said Paul Levy, CEO of Center City District. “It’s completely different from Times Square though it is using the technology. Times Square isn’t even close to what we are thinking about. Toronto and Boston have sign districts and this is even more restrictive.”

    These sign districts have a way of enlivening an area and, though they capture foot traffic, can even create foot traffic by being interactive by streaming a live feed of a concert at the Kimmel Center or baseball or football games, Levy said, noting people visit Comcast Center just to view the animated images. The revenues the billboards will generate is a way to fill a funding hole local and state governments can’t tap to support development activity.

    “If you go back 50 years there were 12 department stores on Market East,” Levy said. “The former Gimbel’s has sat vacant for 30 years.” The Gimbel’s was at 8th and Market where Goldenberg’s surface lot now sits.

    The hospitality-and-tourism industry has long pressed for changes along Market East, urging retailers and retail landlords on Market East to make existing stores more “street friendly.”

    For instance, they would create storefronts along portions of the Gallery where there are currently blank walls at street level. They would also like to see more convention-style hotels to meet demand for the increased size of the convention center. Center City needs an additional 800 hotel rooms.

    “The Market East area is an essential connector between the Convention Center District and the Historic District,” said Jack Ferguson, incoming president of the Philadelphia Convention & Visitors Bureau. “With the highest foot traffic of any part of the city, Market East has great potential for development and prosperity and there are many partners working together to ensure that this happens in a timely and strategic fashion because the evolution of a first-class destination retail and entertainment district around the convention center benefits everyone — both visitors and residents.”

    David Eisner, president and CEO of the National Constitution Center, said Independence Mall attractions would benefit from a stronger Market East corridor.

    “The next big change is Market Street, from the Pennsylvania Convention Center,” said Eisner. “Instead of just an artery, you’d have something nice. The buildings along there have nice ‘bones.’”

    Without the sign district, however, kicking off new construction or massive redevelopment projects will be difficult to finance, the developers said.

    “It’s a piece of the solution,” said Joe Coradino, president of PREIT. “It’s certainly not the only solution because there are a lot of other things that come into play. I’ve been doing this for 30 years. This is by far the most complicated transaction I’ve been involved with.”

    PREIT bought the Gallery in mid-2003 and late 2004 from Rouse Co., a Maryland retail real estate company. At a dinner celebrating the closing of the transaction, a Rouse executive told Coradino that Rouse Co. had been unable to line up financing for the Gallery because its ownership structure is so complicated lenders steered clear of it, Coradino recalled. The Redevelopment Authority owns the ground, PREIT owns a long-term lease on it and SEPTA and other stakeholders control other parts of the property.

    “That was one piece to overcome,” Coradino said, noting that PREIT is trying to simplify some of the ownership arrangement to make it more attractive to lenders. “The second piece is no money has been invested into the Gallery in its history.”

    The 1.1 million-square-foot urban mall opened in 1977.

    PREIT had been investigating ways to help finance redevelopment of the property. In 2008, Foxwoods Casino considered locating there but that got scrapped. The company then began exploring sign districts for the last year or so, looking at similar projects in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, Toronto and elsewhere to see what they looked like, whether they would work along Market East and whether they could be a revenue source.

    “Tenants are not going to pay the rent to justify this massive investment,” Coradino said, noting current retailers don’t capture the 60,000 commuters and others who pass through the building every day.

    PREIT is deep into its plans for the Gallery. It has an architectural design and it’s going over how the stores and restaurants would be laid out in the redeveloped space. It already has interest from prospective retailers.

    “It’s crystallizing in our mind and getting close with the city but we still have some work to do,” he said.

    Across the street, owners of 1100 E. Market envision a four-story, 280,000-square-foot glass building with two levels of underground parking that would replace the existing structure. A lease for a large retail anchor, which is rumored to be Target though couldn’t be confirmed, is under negotiation and would help kick off the building. If everything falls into place, including relocating existing tenants, the new space could open in 2014.

    “This will be a prime shopping destination for Philadelphia,” said Larry Botel, managing partner at JOSS Realty of New York.

    A sign overlay would be a needed boost to the project, Botel said, since the current lending environment is still tight for new construction and retail rents don’t support it either.

    “It would be a challenge without the sign district,” he said. “We don’t want it to be loud and flashy, but it needs to be what it is to enliven the street.”

    Read more: Plans unveiled for E. Market | Philadelphia Business Journal

  7. #7
    cubanChris is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    117

    Default

    Wow. I had no idea such a substantial article lay under the premium block.

    I mean, I know this should all be taken with a grain of salt, but if the target half over the hotel half came true it would be still be an absolute sea change.

    What else can we do but hold onto that hope eh? Fingers crossed.

  8. #8
    billy ross is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    9,486

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by westphillylove View Post
    Hey. My name is Will. I'm new to the site. Here is the full article from the Philadelphia Business Journal.
    People on here like to talk trash on DiCicco, but I totally support what DiCicco and Kenney are going here. They get it. Kenney especially is awesome.

  9. #9
    y.lama is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    South Broad (SoBro)
    Posts
    400

    Default

    thanks for the full article. I think with all of the time that's been spent on this message board discussing Market East it's great to see things could be moving forward (fingers crossed). For those of us that support this; if there ever was a project where we could come away from the computers and actually do something to encourage the project this is it (i know some already do get involved).

  10. #10
    eldondre is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    18,030

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by desolate
    The gallery, is still a standard retail shell.

    WHen a business has the option, they choose the shell over a 19th Centuty Brownstone with steps, no parking and piss poor electric, digital, etc.
    that's a nice theory but here's what the gallery replaced:
    10th & Market

    11th and Market


    bingham house

    brownstone? I think one could argue there's more wasted space in the configuration of the gallery than there would be in a building like this where the upper floors would have non-retail uses.

    squat building, former life


    seems hard to believe the city woudl reject this plan. it's a chance to remake the corridor at virtually no cost to the city. I'd also point out that they do say that a large part of the problem IS ownership of the gallery, which has been mentioned here often
    Last edited by eldondre; 12-10-2010 at 10:36 AM.
    "It has shown me that everything is illuminated in the light of the past"
    Jonathan Safran Foer

  11. #11
    BenDee is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,533

    Default

    This will be amazing if it can be completed - as cubanChris said, it will be a total sea change on Market East. It would extend the 'nice' area by at least a full block, and may be enough to continue to squeeze the low-rent tenants (Gold Galore, Money Mart, etc.) out of Market East. If both of these projects are completed, the only truly low-rent tenants left on Market would be on the South side of the 900 and 1000 blocks.

    The other property I wish they would convert is the surface lot at 1301 Market - it is really sad to have a surface lot on Market Street half a block from City Hall. It should be prime property. Currently

  12. #12
    dartmo is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    285

    Default

    I'd be interested on how the details work out, but this is great in theory. I'll take somewhat flashy signs over the current state of Market East any day. Any change would be an improvement. Don't understand exactly which residents would have their homes affected, its one of the main commercial drags.

  13. #13
    eldondre is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    18,030

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BenDee View Post
    ...The other property I wish they would convert is the surface lot at 1301 Market - it is really sad to have a surface lot on Market Street half a block from City Hall. It should be prime property. Currently
    882509400 1301-05 MARKET ST PARKING LOT COMMERCIAL RAPPAPORT SAMUEL $1 04/30/1971 $1,350,000 $39,234.24
    882509425 1307-11 MARKET ST PARKING LOT COMMERCIAL RAPPAPORT SAMUEL $1 07/24/1976 $1,350,000 $39,234.24
    882509450 1315 MARKET ST PARKING LOT COMMERCIAL RAPPAPORT SAMUEL $1 06/24/1981 $450,000 $13,078.08
    hopefully the switch to stormwater runoff charges will be enough to motivate them to sell this property. they also own the forum on west market.
    1300 market north side 1920

    1960


    notice also center island platforms with buses
    "It has shown me that everything is illuminated in the light of the past"
    Jonathan Safran Foer

  14. #14
    londoner is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    681

    Default

    I love the momentum. Having political muscle finally behind this cause is enormous. Suddenly, these half-assed property owners are coming from the woodwork!...100's of millions of dollars in potential investment?

  15. #15
    CountFunkula's Avatar
    CountFunkula is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    698

    Default

    Is it inappropriate to mention that all this talk is giving me a boner?

  16. #16
    cubanChris is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    117

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CountFunkula View Post
    Is it inappropriate to mention that all this talk is giving me a boner?

  17. #17
    radiocolin's Avatar
    radiocolin is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,229

    Default

    It would be incredible if this transformation happened. Maybe they could also eliminate some Market St buses, since theres a perfectly good subway underneath.

  18. #18
    Mike D is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    East Falls, PA
    Posts
    324

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by radiocolin View Post
    It would be incredible if this transformation happened. Maybe they could also eliminate some Market St buses, since theres a perfectly good subway underneath.
    Or people can learn to walk some more.

    One thing I find stupid with Septa and their bus stops in this city...every block! As if people cannot walk one or two additional blocks. It would make traffic flow easier and create some efficiency within the transit system.

  19. #19
    desolate's Avatar
    desolate is offline Double spaced
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    8,355

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by radiocolin View Post
    It would be incredible if this transformation happened. Maybe they could also eliminate some Market St buses, since theres a perfectly good subway underneath.
    Most of those buses are NJT.

    Which saddens me becuase they could be stopping in Camden.
    I'm not seeing all these supposed bikes in all these million dollar bike lanes.

  20. #20
    desolate's Avatar
    desolate is offline Double spaced
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    8,355

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike D View Post
    Or people can learn to walk some more.

    One thing I find stupid with Septa and their bus stops in this city...every block! As if people cannot walk one or two additional blocks. It would make traffic flow easier and create some efficiency within the transit system.
    Old People show up to fight the removal. Lots of old people. and cripples.
    I'm not seeing all these supposed bikes in all these million dollar bike lanes.

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2